Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy S III mini
NFCGT-I8190N
| Global Score | |
| 61.1 | 66.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.1.2, 4.1.1 | -- |
| 2012-10-11 | 2017-06-22 |
| 4.78 x 2.48 x 0.39 inches | 5.69 x 2.83 x 0.37 inches |
| 4.23 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Blue and White | Black and Gold |
| -- | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 145.00 | $ 130.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 5 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 233 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| STE U8420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 8920 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1000 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP1 (320 MHz) GPU | Adreno 308 GPU |
| 7.83 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.71 | 8.36 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4.3 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2800mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 460 hours standby time 14.2 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto E4 is slightly better than the Galaxy S III mini, having a general score of 66.5 against 61.1. The Motorola Moto E4 is a noticeably newer and a little thinner cellphone than the Galaxy S III mini, but it's incredibly heavier. Galaxy S III mini features a bit more vivid display than Moto E4, although it has a just a little worse display pixels density, a really smaller screen and a way worse 800 x 480 resolution.
Motorola Moto E4 features a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy S III mini, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with a greater number of cores (and they are faster) and a higher amount of RAM memory. The Moto E4 takes much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S III mini, because it has a camera in the back with way more MP and a much better 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition.
The Motorola Moto E4 counts with a bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S III mini, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Motorola Moto E4 also has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 128 GB. Moto E4 features a way better battery duration than Galaxy S III mini, because it has 2800mAh of battery capacity.
Motorola Moto E4 not only is the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.