Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.9 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.3, 4.1.2, 4.1.1, 4.0.4 | Android 11 |
| 2012-05-03 | 2021-05-26 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.37 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.71 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown, Gray, Pink, Red and White | Aurora Green, Chrome Silver, Graphite Gray and Nighttime Blue |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 220.00 | $ 199.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 4 (4412) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A76 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP4 (Quad-Core 266 MHz) GPU | Arm Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.56 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 8.47 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 830 hours standby time 22.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G is just a bit better than Galaxy S III, with a global score of 79.5 against 72.9. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G design is newer, but extremely heavier and a bit thicker than the Galaxy S III. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G has a newer 11 version and Galaxy S III has Android 4.3, so it counts with lots of additional features and enhanced performance.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G features just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy S III, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with more RAM memory and a greater number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy S III features a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, although it has a way worse 1280 x 720 resolution, a lot smaller screen and a little worse pixel quantity in each inch of screen.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G counts with a slightly bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S III, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G captures much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy S III, because it has a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels, a lot larger diafragm aperture to capture better captures and videos in low light situations and a much bigger camera sensor providing a way higher image quality.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G has a much longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S III, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2100mAh.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G is also cheaper, making it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.