Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.9 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.3, 4.1.2, 4.1.1, 4.0.4 | Android 11 |
| 2012-05-03 | 2021-04-28 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.71 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown, Gray, Pink, Red and White | Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 220.00 | $ 229.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 300 cd/m2 brightness | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 4 (4412) chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP4 (Quad-Core 266 MHz) GPU | Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.56 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 8.47 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 830 hours standby time 22.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S III, having a global score of 78.2 against 72.9. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S's body is a lot newer and just a little bit thinner than Samsung Galaxy S III's, but it is also way heavier. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has 11 version while Samsung Galaxy S III has Android 4.3.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S features a little sharper screen than Galaxy S III, because it has a much bigger screen, a lot brighter display, a way higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a higher count of pixels per inch in the screen. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S counts with a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy S III, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with a greater number of cores and 4 GB more RAM.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S takes better videos and photos than Galaxy S III, because it has a much better resolution back facing camera and a lot larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photos. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has just a bit more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S III, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S counts with a very superior battery life than Galaxy S III, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2100mAh.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S costs a little more than the Samsung Galaxy S III, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.