Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-16 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | Black, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 342.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 502 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a global score of 93.6, which is much better than the Google Pixel's overall score of 80.2. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G's construction is noticeably newer and just a bit thinner than the Google Pixel's, although it's much heavier. The Galaxy S10 5G has a little bit better looking screen than Google Pixel, because it has a way better 1440 x 3040 resolution, a really bigger display and a little greater pixel density.
Galaxy S10 5G has just a bit better processing power than Google Pixel, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a larger number of cores (and faster). The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a much better memory for applications and games than Google Pixel, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy S10 5G features a slightly better camera than Google Pixel, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor taking less light and washed colors, a less MP resolution back camera and a worse (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a lot bigger aperture for better captures and video in poorly lited situations.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a much longer battery life than Google Pixel, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 2770mAh.
Galaxy S10 5G is a bit more expensive than Google Pixel, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.