Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-16 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 342.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 502 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is better than the Google Pixel 3, getting a 93.6 score against 80. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G's design has the same thickness than Google Pixel 3, but it's noticeably heavier. The Galaxy S10 5G features a bit faster processor than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10 5G also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy S10 5G counts with a little bit better display than Google Pixel 3, because it has a higher 1440 x 3040 pixels resolution, a little bit higher amount of pixels in each inch of screen and a larger display. The Galaxy S10 5G captures just a bit better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a lower (4K) video quality and a lower 12 mega pixels resolution back facing camera, and they both have a 0.39 inches camera sensor, the Galaxy S10 5G also counts with a larger camera aperture.
Galaxy S10 5G features a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Galaxy S10 5G counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy S10 5G costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel 3, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.