Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-16 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 342.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 502 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has an overall score of 93.6, which is much better than Google Pixel 3a's score of 78.8. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G's body is a little thinner but incredibly heavier than the Google Pixel 3a, and both were released with only 0 months difference. Both of these phones have the same Android 11 operating system, so they should provide you the same operating system features.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a bit faster processing unit than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has a larger amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a slightly better screen than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a just a bit greater quantity of pixels per inch of display, a higher 1440 x 3040px resolution and a bigger screen.
The Galaxy S10 5G counts with a much greater memory capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy S10 5G takes clearer videos and photos than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a lower video resolution and a worse 12 megapixels resolution back camera, and they both have a 0.39 inches sensor, the Galaxy S10 5G also counts with a larger camera aperture.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a much better battery duration than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
The Galaxy S10 5G is a lot more expensive than the Google Pixel 3a, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.