Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-16 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 342.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 502 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has an overall score of 93.6, which is much better than Google Pixel 4's score of 81.9. Even though the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G and Google Pixel 4 were released with only a couple months difference, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G body is heavier but just a little bit thinner than Google Pixel 4.
The Galaxy S10 5G has a bit better looking display than Google Pixel 4, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3040px, a bit higher display pixels density and a larger screen. Google Pixel 4 features a CPU that's very similar to the Galaxy S10 5G one, and although the Google Pixel 4 has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy S10 5G captures a bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a lower resolution camera and a lower (4K) video quality, and they both have the same back camera sensor size, the Galaxy S10 5G also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better low-light photography.
Galaxy S10 5G features a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a very superior battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 2800mAh.
Galaxy S10 5G is a bit more expensive than the Google Pixel 4, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.