Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-16 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 342.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 502 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a score of 93.6, which is much better than Google Pixel 4 XL's 82.9 overall score. Although the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G and the Google Pixel 4 XL were only released with a couple months difference, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G construction is a little bit heavier but also just a little thinner.
Google Pixel 4 XL's processor is very similar to the processor in Galaxy S10 5G, and although the Google Pixel 4 XL has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores. The Google Pixel 4 XL features a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1440 x 3040px, the Google Pixel 4 XL also counts with a bit more pixels per display inch.
The Galaxy S10 5G features a bit better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a back facing camera with less MP resolution and a worse video definition, and they both have the same camera sensor size, the Galaxy S10 5G also counts with a bigger aperture. The Galaxy S10 5G counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy S10 5G has greater battery life than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 22 percent more battery size.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Galaxy S10 5G is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.