Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-16 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | Clearly white and Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 342.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 502 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 5G is slightly better than Google Pixel 4a 5G, having a 93.6 score against 87.5. Despite of the fact the Galaxy S10 5G is older and somewhat heavier than the Google Pixel 4a 5G, it's construction is still a bit thinner. Both phones in this comparison review work with the same Android 11 operating system.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a bit superior CPU than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a little bit better display than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a bit higher pixels quantity in each inch of screen, a little larger display and a better resolution of 1440 x 3040px.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G and Samsung Galaxy S10 5G both feature really similar cameras, because although the Google Pixel 4a 5G has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light captures and video, and they both have the same video quality, the same video frame rate and a 0.39 inches sensor, it also counts with a better 12.2 megapixels resolution back camera.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a much greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity. Galaxy S10 5G features just a bit better battery life than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 16% greater battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is not only the best devices in our comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.