Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-16 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 342.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 502 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a general score of 93.6, which is a little bit better than Google Pixel 5's general score of 89. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is a incredibly heavier phone than the Google Pixel 5, but both of them have the same thickness. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a slightly better screen than Google Pixel 5, because it has a little bit larger screen, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels and a bit better pixels number per display inch.
The Galaxy S10 5G features a bit faster processing unit than Google Pixel 5. Both have a Octa-Core CPU and a 8 GB RAM. The Google Pixel 5's camera is just as good as the camera in Galaxy S10 5G, because although the Google Pixel 5 has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for taking images and/or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the same 60 fps video frame rate and the same camera sensor size, it also counts with a camera with a higher 12.2 mega pixels resolution.
Galaxy S10 5G has a much better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 5, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with just a bit better battery duration than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 10 percent more battery size.
Galaxy S10 5G is not only the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.