Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-16 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 342.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 502 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 5G is much better than HTC U Ultra, having a score of 93.6 against 77. The Galaxy S10 5G is a heavier cellphone than the HTC U Ultra, but both have the same thickness. The Galaxy S10 5G has a little sharper screen than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 3040 and a bigger screen.
HTC U Ultra counts with a bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a bit better CPU than HTC U Ultra, because it has a larger number of cores and more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G captures slightly better pictures and videos than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor which offers a lower image and video quality, and they both have a same resolution back camera and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also counts with faster video frame rate and a larger diafragm aperture to take better photos and videos in low-light situations.
The Galaxy S10 5G has a very superior battery life than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.