Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-16 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 342.00 | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 502 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is better than the LG G8X ThinQ, having a general score of 93.6 against 82.7. Although Samsung Galaxy S10 5G and LG G8X ThinQ were released only 6 months apart, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G body is a bit thinner but also just a bit heavier. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has 11 version while LG G8X ThinQ has Android 10, offering some extra features.
The LG G8X ThinQ and Samsung Galaxy S10 5G count with very similar CPUs, and although the LG G8X ThinQ has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy S10 5G has a bit better looking display than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3040px, a little bit larger screen and a little better pixels amount in each screen inch.
The Galaxy S10 5G shoots slightly better videos and photos than LG G8X ThinQ, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the same video frame rates, the same sensor size and a same resolution camera, the Galaxy S10 5G also has a bigger aperture. LG G8X ThinQ counts with a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features just a bit better battery life than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a 13 percent bigger battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G costs a lot more money than LG G8X ThinQ, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.