Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-16 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | Titan gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 342.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 502 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has an overall score of 93.6, which is slightly better than LG K92's general score of 85.4. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has newer 11 version and LG K92 has Android 10. Although Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is older than LG K92, it's design is a little thinner and just a little bit lighter.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a little bit better hardware performance than LG K92, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a bit sharper display than LG K92, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has a higher 1440 x 3040 resolution and more pixels per inch of display.
The LG K92 has much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The LG K92 captures better pictures and videos than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light photography and worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the LG K92 also counts with a camera with a much higher resolution and a lot bigger sensor capturing much higher quality photos.
Galaxy S10 5G counts with a bit superior battery life than LG K92, because it has a 13% greater battery capacity.
Galaxy S10 5G is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also cheaper than the LG K92.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.