Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-05-16 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 342.00 | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 502 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.7 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 5G has a global score of 93.6, which is much better than LG V10's score of 78.6. Although Galaxy S10 5G is a bit heavier than LG V10, it's just a bit thinner and newer. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S10 5G has a more recent 11 version while LG V10 has Android 5.1.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a better performing processor than LG V10, because it has more RAM and a greater number of faster cores. LG V10 counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a bit lower 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution, it also counts with a quite greater pixel density.
The LG V10 captures slightly better pictures and videos than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light photos and a smaller back camera sensor shooting worse quality photographs and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the LG V10 also counts with a camera with a way better 16 mega-pixels resolution and faster 120 frames per second video frame rates.
The LG V10 has a better memory for apps and games than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy S10 5G features a much longer battery performance than LG V10, because it has a 50 percent bigger battery capacity.
The Galaxy S10 5G is more expensive than the LG V10, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.