Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-05-16 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 342.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 502 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a general score of 93.6, which is much better than the LG V30S ThinQ's general score of 82.5. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G design is newer than the LG V30S ThinQ's, although it's a little thicker and way heavier. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has an older 11 version and LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
LG V30S ThinQ features a display that's just as good as Samsung Galaxy S10 5G's display, because although the LG V30S ThinQ has a little lower resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit higher count of pixels per inch of display. LG V30S ThinQ features a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a bit better hardware performance than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with greater battery life than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy S10 5G counts with a bit better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a worse (4K) video definition and a lot lower 12 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a better image and video quality and a bigger camera aperture for better photography and video in low-light situations.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, Galaxy S10 5G is also by far the cheapest one, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.