Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-16 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 342.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 502 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is a bit better than the LG Velvet, with a 93.6 score against 87.1. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is a just a little bit heavier phone than LG Velvet, but both have the same thickness. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a bit sharper screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels density and a higher 1440 x 3040 resolution.
The LG Velvet counts with a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy S10 5G features a little better hardware performance than LG Velvet, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S10 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The LG Velvet takes much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low-light images, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the LG Velvet also counts with a back camera with a much better resolution and a way larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality photos.
The Galaxy S10 5G has just a bit longer battery life than LG Velvet, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4300mAh.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is more expensive than LG Velvet, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.