Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13 |
| 2019-05-16 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | Interstellar Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 342.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 502 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 5G has a score of 93.6, which is better than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro's 83.4 global score. The Galaxy S10 5G construction is a bit lighter and just a bit thinner than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released 4 years before. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS, but the Galaxy S10 5G has an older 11 version and Motorola Edge 40 Pro has Android 13 version.
The Galaxy S10 5G features a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a little bit better display than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, although it has a lot worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bit less pixels per inch in the screen, they both have a same size screen.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro features as much memory for applications and games as the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, both have exactly the same 256 GB internal storage. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S10 5G, because it has a 4600mAh battery capacity. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a lot better camera than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for capturing images and video in low-light environments, it also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor, a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition and a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.