Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-05-16 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 342.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 502 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 5G is better than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, with a general score of 93.6 against 81.9. The Galaxy S10 5G construction is just a little bit thinner than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it is heavier and was released many years before. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S10 5G has 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14 version.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, although it has a quite worse screen pixels density, a bit smaller display and a bit worse 1256 x 2760 resolution. The Galaxy S10 5G has an extremely better CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Neo. They have a Octa-Core processor and a 8 GB RAM memory.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo captures much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rates and a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back camera with a way higher 50 megapixels resolution.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo and Samsung Galaxy S10 5G both feature similar storage capacity for applications and games, both have exactly the same internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has just a little better battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.