Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-05-16 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 342.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 502 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 5G has a general score of 93.6, which is a bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Pro's overall score of 86.3. These phones include Android operating system, but Galaxy S10 5G has 11 version while Motorola Edge 50 Pro has Android 14. The Galaxy S10 5G design is a bit thinner than the Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it's a little heavier and was released many years before.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, although it has a just a little lower display density and a lot lower 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, they both have a screen of the same size. Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a very superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because it has more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy S10 5G features a lot better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro's battery life is just as good as the Galaxy S10 5G one. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also counts with a lot larger sensor, a larger camera aperture to take better low light photos and a way more megapixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.