Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-05-16 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 342.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 502 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is a bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, having a 93.6 score against 87.1. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has 11 version while Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has Android 14. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is a notably older and a little bit heavier phone than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, but Samsung was able to build it just a little bit thinner anyway.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a more vivid screen than Galaxy S10 5G, although it has a little worse display pixel density and a way lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, they both have a same size screen. Galaxy S10 5G counts with a much powerful processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also counts with a camera in the back with a lot higher 50 mega-pixels resolution and a much larger sensor capturing much higher quality photos.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy S10 5G have extremely similar battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.