Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-16 | 2020-12-07 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 342.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LTPS |
| 502 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 5G is much better than Moto G 5G, with a 93.6 score against 81.5. The Galaxy S10 5G body is way thinner and just a bit lighter than Moto G 5G, despite of the fact that it was released just a bit over a year before. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S10 5G has 11 version while Moto G 5G has Android 10 version, providing you lots of additional features and optimized performance.
Galaxy S10 5G counts with a little sharper screen than Motorola Moto G 5G, and although they both have a same size display, the Galaxy S10 5G also has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040px and more pixels per inch of screen. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features slightly more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Moto G 5G, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy S10 5G counts with just a little better hardware performance than Moto G 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S10 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. Motorola Moto G 5G has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate and a tinier aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola Moto G 5G also counts with a much higher resolution back-facing camera.
Motorola Moto G 5G counts with a bit superior battery life than Galaxy S10 5G, because it has an 11 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.