Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-16 | 2020-07-08 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | Surfing blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 342.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LCD |
| 502 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 5G is better than Moto G 5G Plus, getting a 93.6 score against 82.6. Even though Galaxy S10 5G is older than Moto G 5G Plus, it's construction is a little bit lighter and thinner. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a little faster processing unit than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy S10 5G counts with a little more vivid display than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, and although they both have a same size display, the Galaxy S10 5G also has a quite greater screen density and a higher 1440 x 3040 resolution. Galaxy S10 5G counts with a little bit better storage for applications and games than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus features a little better battery life than Galaxy S10 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Moto G 5G Plus shoots much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has lower video frame rates and a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Moto G 5G Plus also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking much better quality photographs and videos and a camera with lot more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.