Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-16 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | Smoke black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 342.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 502 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 5G has a global score of 93.6, which is much better than the Moto G Power's 76.1 overall score. Both phones in this comparison review come with the same Android 11 OS, so both of them should give you identical operating system features. Galaxy S10 5G is an older phone than Moto G Power, but Samsung made it just a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner.
The Galaxy S10 5G counts with a bit more powerful processor than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10 5G also has more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a bit sharper display than Motorola Moto G Power, because it has a higher display density, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels and a little bit larger screen.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a camera with a way worse 12 MP resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better photos and videos in low light environments and a larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a better image and video quality.
The Galaxy S10 5G has more memory capacity for apps and games than Moto G Power, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Motorola Moto G Power counts with a little longer battery performance than Galaxy S10 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy S10 5G is a lot more expensive than Moto G Power, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.