Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-16 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 342.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 502 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has an overall score of 93.6, which is a bit better than the Moto G200 5G's global score of 86.2. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is an a lot older phone than Moto G200 5G, but Samsung was able to make it just a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. Both of these devices have the same Android 11 OS (operating system).
The Moto G200 5G has a bit better processing unit than Galaxy S10 5G. They have 8 GB of RAM and 8 CPU cores. The Galaxy S10 5G counts with a little sharper display than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels and a greater screen pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a much bigger storage to install games and applications than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Moto G200 5G has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a way smaller camera aperture and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Moto G200 5G also counts with a back camera with a much better 108 mega pixels resolution.
Motorola Moto G200 5G features just a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because it has an 11 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.