Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-16 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | Capri blue and Smoke black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 342.00 | $ 237.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 502 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 5G is a lot better than Motorola Moto G8 Power, getting a 93.6 score against 76. These phones work with Android OS, but Galaxy S10 5G has a newer 11 version while Motorola Moto G8 Power has Android 10, counting with a couple additional features and performance improvements. The Galaxy S10 5G is an older and a little heavier phone than Motorola Moto G8 Power, but Samsung could make it thinner anyway.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a little more vivid display than Moto G8 Power, because it has more pixels per display inch, a little larger screen and a better 1440 x 3040 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto G8 Power, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy S10 5G features a bit more powerful CPU than Moto G8 Power, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S10 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Moto G8 Power has just a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy S10 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. The Galaxy S10 5G has a bit better camera than Motorola Moto G8 Power, because although it has a worse (4K) video quality and a way lower 12 megapixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a larger camera sensor capturing higher quality pictures and a larger camera aperture for better low light captures and video.
Galaxy S10 5G is a lot more expensive than Motorola Moto G8 Power, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.