Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-16 | 2020-08-28 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | Forest green and Sapphire blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 342.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 502 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has an overall score of 93.6, which is way better than the Moto G9 Play's score of 76.7. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a newer 11 version while Moto G9 Play has Android 10, counting with a lot of extra features and improved performance. Even though the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is older than Moto G9 Play, it's design is thinner and a bit lighter.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features just a little better hardware performance than Moto G9 Play, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a much better screen than Moto G9 Play, because it has a much better resolution of 1440 x 3040, a little larger display and a lot better display pixel density.
The Motorola Moto G9 Play captures clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G9 Play also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor shooting much higher quality photos and a lot more mega-pixels camera.
The Galaxy S10 5G counts with more storage for apps and games than Moto G9 Play, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Moto G9 Play has just a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because it has an 11% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.