Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 80.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-16 | 2020-09-07 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 7.88 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | Blush gold and Navy blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 342.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 502 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 5G is better than the Motorola Moto G9 Plus, with a 93.6 score against 80.5. The Galaxy S10 5G construction is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than the Motorola Moto G9 Plus, although it was released a bit more further than a year before. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S10 5G has the newer 11 version and Motorola Moto G9 Plus has Android 10.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a bit sharper display than Moto G9 Plus, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3040px and more pixels per inch in the screen. The Motorola Moto G9 Plus counts with just a bit bigger memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy S10 5G features a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G9 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S10 5G also has 4 GB more RAM. The Moto G9 Plus features a much better camera than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for capturing pictures or videos in low light environments and slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Moto G9 Plus also counts with a much larger back camera sensor and a much more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Motorola Moto G9 Plus features a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S10 5G, because it has an 11 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.