Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-05-16 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 342.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 502 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 5G has a score of 93.6, which is a lot better than the Motorola Moto Z Force's 75.8 global score. Both phones we compare here work with Android operating system, but Galaxy S10 5G has the older 11 version while Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat. Galaxy S10 5G is a newer cellphone than Motorola Moto Z Force, but it's somewhat heavier and a little thicker.
The Galaxy S10 5G has a bit sharper display than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a little lower pixel quantity in each inch of display, it also counts with a larger display and a quite better 1440 x 3040 pixels resolution. The Moto Z Force has a bigger storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with just a little better processing power than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a greater number of cores (and faster). Galaxy S10 5G takes a little bit better photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a back-facing camera with a lot worse 12 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture for better photos and videos in low light situations.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with improved battery performance than Moto Z Force, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G costs more than the Motorola Moto Z Force, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.