Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-16 | 2016-07-28 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 342.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 502 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 5G is much better than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, having a 93.6 score against 76.4. The Galaxy S10 5G construction is incredibly newer, but somewhat heavier and just a bit thicker than Moto Z Force Droid Edition. The Galaxy S10 5G counts with a little better processing power than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has 4 more cpu cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S10 5G counts with a bit more vivid display than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a bit inferior pixel number per inch of display, it also counts with a bigger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 3040. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G captures a little bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a lot lower 12 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and a worse 3840x2160 video quality, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture.
The Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with a better storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy S10 5G has improved battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.