Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-16 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 342.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 502 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is a lot better than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, having a overall score of 93.6 against 77.4. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G's construction is newer than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition's, but it's way heavier and noticeably thicker. Galaxy S10 5G features a bit more powerful processing unit than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10 5G also has 4 GB more RAM.
Moto Z2 Force Edition features a screen that is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G one, because although the Moto Z2 Force Edition has a little smaller screen and a bit lower 1440 x 2560 resolution, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the screen. Moto Z2 Force Edition features more memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy S10 5G counts with a way better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 65% bigger battery size. Galaxy S10 5G features a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same resolution camera in the back and the same video quality, the Galaxy S10 5G also has higher 60 frames per second video frame rates, a larger sensor providing a better image quality and a lot bigger camera aperture to take better images and videos in low light situations.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.