Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-16 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 342.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 502 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 5G is way better than the Moto Z2 Play, having a general score of 93.6 against 77.4. Even though the Galaxy S10 5G is newer than Moto Z2 Play, it is a lot heavier and noticeably thicker. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a little faster CPU than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has 4 GB more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has just a bit better looking display than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a bigger screen, a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3040px and a greater number of pixels per inch of screen. The Moto Z2 Play has a quite bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a much better battery performance than Moto Z2 Play, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G takes a little bit better photos and videos than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a same resolution camera and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has faster video frame rate and a bigger camera aperture.
The Galaxy S10 5G is way more expensive than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.