Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-05-16 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 342.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 502 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a general score of 93.6, which is way better than Moto Z3's 77.6 score. Although Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is newer than the Moto Z3, it is thicker and incredibly heavier. These phones use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has the previous 11 version while Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Galaxy S10 5G features a bit more powerful CPU than Moto Z3, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S10 5G also has more RAM memory. Galaxy S10 5G features a little more vivid display than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a bit bigger display, a quite higher display density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels.
The Galaxy S10 5G has a bit better camera than Moto Z3, and although they both have a 12 mega-pixels camera and the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy S10 5G also has a much larger diafragm aperture for better images and video in low light environments, higher video frame rate and a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Motorola Moto Z3 counts with a greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a very superior battery duration than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G costs more than Moto Z3, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.