Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-16 | 2018-06-29 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 342.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 502 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 5G has a global score of 93.6, which is a lot better than Moto Z3 Play's global score of 76.3. Galaxy S10 5G's body is newer than the Moto Z3 Play's, but it is thicker and incredibly heavier. The Galaxy S10 5G features a bit superior CPU than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S10 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a little sharper display than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a little larger display, a higher 1440 x 3040px resolution and a just a bit more pixels per inch of display. Galaxy S10 5G has a bit better camera than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the same sensor size and the same resolution back facing camera, the Galaxy S10 5G also has a bigger camera aperture to take better low light photography and videos and faster 60 fps video frame rates.
Moto Z3 Play features a greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy S10 5G counts with a way better battery life than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
The Galaxy S10 5G not only is the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.