Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-16 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 342.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 502 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is much better than Motorola One Hyper, getting a score of 93.6 against 79.8. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is a somewhat thinner and just a bit lighter device than the Motorola One Hyper, even though both were only released with a couple months difference. These phones come with the same Android 11 operating system, so both should give you all the same OS features.
The Galaxy S10 5G has just a bit better performance than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy S10 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. The Galaxy S10 5G counts with a slightly better display than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040px, a higher display pixels density and a bit bigger screen.
Motorola One Hyper has a better storage for applications and games than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Motorola One Hyper has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate and a way smaller aperture, and they both have the same video quality, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a way more megapixels camera in the back.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a little longer battery performance than Motorola One Hyper, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, Galaxy S10 5G is also cheaper than the Motorola One Hyper, which makes this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.