Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-16 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | Blue and Brown |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 342.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 502 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 5G is much better than Motorola One Vision, with a global score of 93.6 against 80.7. The Galaxy S10 5G construction is a bit heavier but just a bit thinner than the Motorola One Vision, and they were only released with a couple of months difference. Galaxy S10 5G has a bit faster CPU than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10 5G also has more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a little sharper screen than Motorola One Vision, because it has a quite bigger display, a better 1440 x 3040 resolution and a little bit higher pixel count in each inch in the display. The Motorola One Vision counts with a much better camera than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for shooting images and video in poorly lited environments and lower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola One Vision also counts with a much higher resolution camera and a way larger back camera sensor.
The Motorola One Vision counts with a slightly bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features longer battery life than Motorola One Vision, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.