Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-16 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 342.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 502 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is just a bit better than Motorola razr (2020), having a score of 93.6 against 87. Both of these devices have the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't see any difference in that aspect. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G's design has the same thickness than Motorola razr (2020), but it is a bit heavier.
Galaxy S10 5G features just a little better hardware performance than Motorola razr (2020). Both have the same RAM memory amount and 8 processing cores. The Galaxy S10 5G features a brighter display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a better pixels count per inch of display, a way better 1440 x 3040 resolution and a quite bigger screen.
The Motorola razr (2020) has as much memory capacity to store more games and applications as Galaxy S10 5G, they have exactly the same internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a superior battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. Motorola razr (2020) features a better camera than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low light photography and slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same video definition, the Motorola razr (2020) also counts with a way better 48 MP resolution back facing camera and a lot bigger back camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Galaxy S10 5G is also a bargain compared to the other ones, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.