Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 15 |
| 2019-05-16 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 6.98 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 342.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | -- |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LTPO |
| 502 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 5G is much better than the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), with a 93.6 score against 79.2. Both phones in this review work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S10 5G has the older 11 version and Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15 version. The Galaxy S10 5G has a much powerful CPU than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores.
Galaxy S10 5G features a much better screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little smaller display. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a much better memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S10 5G, because it has more internal memory. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light photography and videos, it also counts with a lot higher video resolution and a much more mega-pixels back camera.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has just a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S10 5G, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.