Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-16 | 2020-05-21 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | Moonlight Black and Starry Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 342.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 502 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 5G is a lot better than the OPPO Find X2 Neo, with a 93.6 score against 77.7. Although it's the best we are comparing, Galaxy S10 5G's body is older, somewhat heavier and just a bit thicker than OPPO Find X2 Neo. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S10 5G has a newer 11 version and OPPO Find X2 Neo has Android 10 version.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a bit more powerful processing unit than OPPO Find X2 Neo, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy S10 5G, although it has a lot worse resolution of 1080 x 2400, a little inferior count of pixels per display inch and a little bit smaller screen.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G and the OPPO Find X2 Neo both have very similar storage to install applications and games, both have the same 256 GB internal storage capacity. The OPPO Find X2 Neo captures much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for shooting pictures and video in low light situations and lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also counts with a way larger sensor capturing much better quality photos and a back camera with much more mega pixels.
The Galaxy S10 5G has just a little bit longer battery life than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 4025mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.