Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-16 | 2021-04-14 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | Galactic Silver and Starlight Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 342.00 | $ 975.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 502 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 5G has a general score of 93.6, which is much better than the OPPO Find X3 Neo's general score of 76. The Galaxy S10 5G design has the same thickness than OPPO Find X3 Neo, but it's a little bit heavier. These devices work with the same Android 11 operating system, so they should give you very similar OS features.
OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with just a bit better display than Galaxy S10 5G, although it has a just a little worse screen pixel density, a lot worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little smaller display. OPPO Find X3 Neo has a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has more RAM.
OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with a much better camera than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for shooting photos or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also counts with a much more MP back camera.
The OPPO Find X3 Neo and Samsung Galaxy S10 5G both have quite similar memory to store more apps and games, both of them have exactly the same internal memory. OPPO Find X3 Neo's battery duration is just as good as the battery performance in Samsung Galaxy S10 5G.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.