Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-05-16 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 342.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 502 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 5G is better than the Galaxy A25 5G, getting a score of 93.6 against 79.9. Both phones we are comparing here have Android OS, but the Galaxy S10 5G has the older 11 version while Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14. Although Galaxy S10 5G is noticeably older and just a little bit heavier than Galaxy A25 5G, it's design is still just a little bit thinner.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a really superior performance than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a bit better looking screen than Galaxy S10 5G, although it has a much lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, a just a bit worse pixel amount per display inch and a bit smaller display.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for taking pictures and/or video in low light environments, lower video frame rates and a smaller camera sensor, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a lot more MP camera.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with more storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a little longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because it has an 11 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.