Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-16 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 342.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 502 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 5G is better than the Galaxy A50, with a global score of 93.6 against 83.8. Galaxy S10 5G is a better device than the Galaxy A50, it must be noted that it's also just a bit thicker and heavier. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy S10 5G features a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a higher 1440 x 3040 resolution, a just a bit better quantity of pixels per inch of display and a quite larger screen. The Galaxy S10 5G captures just a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a lot lower 12 megapixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video definition, a bigger camera sensor providing a higher image quality and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photography and video in poorly lited environments.
The Galaxy A50 has a little bit better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy S10 5G has a little better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The Galaxy S10 5G is a lot more expensive than Galaxy A50, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.