Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-16 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 342.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 502 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A50s, getting a overall score of 93.6 against 86.6. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is an a little thicker and heavier device than Samsung Galaxy A50s. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a more recent 11 version while Samsung Galaxy A50s has Android 10.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy S10 5G counts with just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A50s, because it has a bit greater pixel density, a better 1440 x 3040 resolution and a little bit bigger display.
Samsung Galaxy A50s has a little bit better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a little longer battery performance than Galaxy A50s, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
The Galaxy A50s captures much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a much tinier aperture and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A50s also counts with a much bigger camera sensor which provides a lot higher photo and video quality and a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.