Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-16 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 342.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 502 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a global score of 93.6, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A51's 85.5 global score. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is a somewhat heavier cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A51, but both are 0.31inches thick. Both phones we are comparing have the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't see any differences regarding that.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A51, because it has a little bit larger screen, a just a bit greater pixels density and a higher 1440 x 3040px resolution. The Galaxy A51 has a little bit better storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a bit better processing unit than Galaxy A51, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has a larger amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a little better battery life than Galaxy A51, because it has a 13 percent more battery capacity.
The Galaxy A51 counts with a superior camera than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a much tinier aperture which is not recommended for low light images and lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the Galaxy A51 also counts with a much bigger sensor which gives a much better photo and video quality and a camera in the back with much more mega-pixels.
The Galaxy S10 5G costs more than Galaxy A51, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.