Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-05-16 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 342.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 502 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 5G is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, having a global score of 93.6 against 91.3. Even though the Galaxy S10 5G is older and just a little heavier than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, it's construction is still just a little bit thinner. Both devices in this comparison have Android operating system, but the Galaxy S10 5G has an older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has Android 12 version.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a just a little better pixels density, a little bit larger display and a better resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels. Galaxy S10 5G counts with just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S10 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A52 5G has a quite bigger storage to install applications and games than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A52 5G takes much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and videos and worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with way more mega-pixels and a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking lot higher quality videos and photographs.
Galaxy A52 5G's battery duration is just as good as Galaxy S10 5G's battery lifetime.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.