Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-16 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 342.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 502 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a score of 93.6, which is a bit better than the Galaxy A52s's overall score of 91.1. Both devices in this review work with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so they should give you the same operating system features. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G body is just a little bit thinner than Galaxy A52s, although it's just a bit heavier and was released 2 years before.
The Galaxy S10 5G counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A52s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S10 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A52s, because it has a better 1440 x 3040px resolution, a quite greater pixel density and a little larger screen.
The Galaxy A52s captures better photographs and videos than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light images and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a back camera with lot more megapixels and a way bigger sensor capturing lot higher quality photographs.
Galaxy A52s counts with a bigger memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy S10 5G and Galaxy A52s feature extremely similar batteries performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.