Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-16 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 342.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 502 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is way better than the Galaxy A70, with a 93.6 score against 76.9. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G body has the same thickness than Galaxy A70, but it's just a bit heavier. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has the newer 11 version while Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version, counting with a couple additional features and some performance improvements.
Galaxy S10 5G features a little sharper display than Galaxy A70, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Galaxy S10 5G also has more pixels per inch of screen and a better 1440 x 3040 resolution. The Galaxy A70 has a bit bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a bit superior CPU than Galaxy A70, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy A70 has a battery performance that's very similar to the Galaxy S10 5G one. Galaxy S10 5G takes way better pictures and videos than Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy S10 5G also has faster video frame rate, a larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a better image and video quality and a bigger aperture for better photography in low-light environments.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G costs a little more than the Galaxy A70, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.