Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 80.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12 |
| 2019-05-16 | -- |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 342.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 502 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | -- |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a general score of 93.6, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G's score of 80.5. Although it's the best phone in this comparison review, Samsung Galaxy S10 5G's body is a bit heavier and just a little bit thicker than Samsung Galaxy A73 5G. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has the previous 11 version while Samsung Galaxy A73 5G has Android 12.
Galaxy S10 5G counts with a very superior performance than Samsung Galaxy A73 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S10 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy S10 5G has a slightly better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A73 5G, and although they both have a same size screen, the Galaxy S10 5G also has a greater quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a higher 1440 x 3040 resolution.
Galaxy A73 5G has a bit better camera than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for shooting photos and video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a back-facing camera with a much higher 108 mega pixels resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A73 5G features a bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A73 5G counts with just a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because it has an 11 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.