Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-16 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 342.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 502 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 5G is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy F62, with a overall score of 93.6 against 88.1. Galaxy S10 5G's design is thinner and a bit lighter than the Samsung Galaxy F62, although it was released around 22 months before. Both devices in our current comparison come with the same Android 11 OS (operating system).
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a little faster CPU than Galaxy F62, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a greater number of faster cores. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy F62, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has a higher 1440 x 3040 resolution and a higher number of pixels per inch in the screen.
Galaxy F62 features a superior camera than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for shooting images or video in low-light situations and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a much better resolution camera in the back and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Samsung Galaxy F62 has more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy F62 counts with a really longer battery duration than Galaxy S10 5G, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.