Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-16 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 342.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 502 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 5G has an overall score of 93.6, which is a little bit better than Galaxy M51's overall score of 87.7. Galaxy S10 5G's construction is just a bit lighter and somewhat thinner than the Galaxy M51, despite of the fact that it was released about 16 months before. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS, but Galaxy S10 5G has the newer 11 version and Galaxy M51 has Android 10, providing a couple nice extra features.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy M51, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has a higher amount of pixels per inch in the display and a higher 1440 x 3040px resolution. Samsung Galaxy M51 has a bit bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a little bit better processing power than Galaxy M51, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy M51 takes better photographs and videos than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has slower video frame rate and a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures and video, and they both have the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy M51 has a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy S10 5G, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.