Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.6 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-05-16 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 342.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 502 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.7 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 5G is better than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5, having a score of 93.6 against 79.3. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S10 5G has a newer 11 version while Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1 version, giving you some additional features. Even though Galaxy S10 5G is notably newer than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5, it's a bit thicker and heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a quite superior performance than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a larger number of cores (and they are faster) and more RAM. Galaxy Note 5 features a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a bit lower 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher amount of pixels per inch of screen.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a back camera with way less MP, it also counts with a much bigger aperture and a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors. Galaxy S10 5G counts with a much better storage for apps and games than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy S10 5G counts with a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.